China Tries to Steal A March (excerpt)
(Source: Asia Times; Jan. 14, 2011)
Former paramount leader Deng Xiaoping once advised his future successors to bide their time and hide their capabilities, but China's military leadership has this month done precisely the opposite, appearing in a big hurry to show the world exactly what they are capable of. It is as though China's first working stealth jet was just too exciting a development to be left sitting unsung in the hangar - especially with US Defense Secretary Robert Gates about to come calling.

The story of the Chengdu J-20 stealth fighter, whose existence was revealed at the turn of the year, is perhaps more remarkable for what it says about the bravura of China's rulers - and about the West's reactions - than for what it reveals about the future capability of the Chinese air force.

Beijing's decision to trumpet the J-20's development resides within the culture of conspicuous wealth which China's urban residents will recognize as a trait of the country's moneyed elite. This is a generation that flaunts its capabilities, not hides them; and as the newest, flashiest expression of China's wealth and vigor the stealth plane simply had to be put on parade where the whole world could see it. The big question is whether we are right to be impressed by their technological achievement.

On January 10, the J-20 prototype took its first flight above Chengdu, provincial capital of Sichuan, but amid the media sensation it was unclear how best to interpret the aircraft's emergence, with the J-20 having become central to two contrasting narratives about the nature and implications of China's military modernization.

In the first, the J-20 has become an emblem of the rise of China and the decline of American power. With the US experiencing technical holdups and huge cost overruns in the development of its own stealth fighter, the F-35, and poised to axe production of its other stealthy jet, the F-22 Raptor, China has displayed its growing confidence and technical prowess by debuting the J-20 years earlier than Western analysts were predicting.

In the second, the J-20's unveiling was little more than a publicity stunt on the part of a government that would sooner try to stoke, rather than calm, American fears. A mishmash of outdated US and Russian design features, the aircraft displayed no signs of genuine Chinese innovation and remained a decade away from active service, its detractors have argued. As a weapon system, its primary role was as a pin with which to prick Gates, whose bridge-building trip to Beijing coincided with the aircraft's appearance on the Chengdu tarmac.

What's clear from the pictures crowding the Chinese blogosphere is that the J-20 is a big aircraft, which may point to a future role as a long-range interceptor or as an anti-access weapon with the ability to operate beyond the second island chain, which includes Guam, home to an important US airbase. However, China's air-to-air refueling capability is not yet mature enough to support this kind of long-range mission, and the J-20's size may point to technical limitations - most likely with the plane's engines, which Chinese industry is yet to build capably - rather than strategic choice.

Whatever the case, the American defense lobby was always likely to interpret the J-20 as a severe threat to US security, having fought a long (and unsuccessful) campaign to keep building the F-22 - an air superiority fighter which they regard as the ultimate guarantor of America's command of the skies. Indeed, the J-20 may have handed the F-22 one final lifeline (See following story—Ed.). Gates, who killed the F-22 program, is about to step down, and his replacement could conceivably hand the Raptor an eleventh-hour reprieve and keep the production line turning. (end of excerpt)

Click here for the full story, on the Asia Times website.

Chinese Fighter Test Embarrasses Gates, Casts Doubt On Goals
(Source: Lexington Institute; issued January 13, 2011)
(© Lexington Institute; reproduced by permission)
Much has been written over the past few days about how the Chinese military's decision to flight-test its new J-20 fighter during a visit by U.S. defense secretary Robert Gates was an embarrassment for China's civilian leaders. Apparently, nobody in the Peoples Liberation Army had bothered to mention the flight to President Hu Jintao, so Gates was the first person to give him a heads up. Imagine how it feels to find out from a visiting foreign dignitary what your own military is doing -- the military that you supposedly lead.

But the person who should really be embarrassed is Secretary Gates, because apparently the former anticommunist hardliner has been so lulled into complacency about high-end security threats by his tenure at the Pentagon that he failed to grasp the rapidity of China's military build-up. Gates terminated production of the Air Force's next-generation F-22 air superiority fighter in 2009 at barely half the service's stated warfighting requirement, saying that China wasn't likely to field something similar before 2020.

He may yet turn out to be right, but the fact the PLA is flight-testing a plane that looks a lot like the F-22 only 20 months later doesn't say much for Gates' sources -- or his judgment.

Gates defenders will counter that although the Chinese J-20 looks a lot like an F-22 in its forward aspect, side and rear views suggest an airframe that is nowhere near as stealthy. Well maybe so, but balanced against that is the fact that China is probably more interested in using the new jet for striking U.S. naval assets, since it won't be feasible for U.S. fighters to sustain a continuous presence in Chinese air space (there aren't enough nearby bases).

Forward-aspect stealth is more important in strike missions than whether you are visible from behind after bombs have been released. The J-20 also looks like a fine tool for threatening neighbors like Japan, which practically begged the Pentagon for years to sell it the F-22. Now it looks unlikely to have anything comparable to the J-20 that it can field for its homeland defense.

Gates has spent much of his tenure focusing on the unfixable problem of Afghanistan, which is one of the most corrupt countries in the world. During that time U.S. forces have done a very effective job of destroying Al Qaeda -- the terrorist band that first drew America into the Afghan quagmire -- but the distraction of trying to also fight a civil war in the backward country has led Gates & Company to make some poor choices about how to prepare for more important challenges.

On one day in spring of 2009, Gates killed the F-22, the Air Force's next-generation bomber, its future secure-communications satellite, and its replacement search-and-rescue helicopter. Now he says he wants to revive the bomber program, but the nation's security would have been better served if he had grasped the significance of the decisions he was making two years ago.

In recent years, China's military has demonstrated the ability to destroy U.S. reconnaissance satellites, tested a maneuvering ballistic missile that can disable U.S. aircraft carriers, and now flown an aircraft with stealth features similar to America's best fighters. How obtuse do our leaders need to be to miss this pattern?

They have wised up about China's predatory trading practices, but they just don't seem to grasp that all those unmanned aircraft they're buying for combating insurgency in Southwest Asia would be gone in the first week of a real fight with China. Instead of buying more stuff that's only suited for dealing with enemies who lack air forces, they ought to be thinking about what the China threat might look like in 20 years.

Refocusing there will inexorably lead to the conclusion that our Air Force needs to have more F-22s -- the only plane optimized for dealing with the kind of air power China seems to be pursuing.


prev next

Breaking News from AFP See all

Press releases See all

Official reports See all